The UN's Guilt for Terrorism - Summary

By CrisHam, 23 January, 2025

 

The long row of unjust resolutions against Israel by the UN was only the continuation of a torpedoing of the Jewish homeland in Palestine by Great Britain. 

    The politics of both amounted to polarization between the population groups.

After the 1948/49 war, the UN released the six Arab aggressor states from their responsibility for the refugees by building refugee camps. Together with a “moral” backing of the never ending revanchist Arab violence this formed a surreal insurance package which relieves them of any responsibility in terms of security policy in the dispute with Israel. The countless UN resolutions on the Middle East conflict, which didn’t admonish Arab aggression but Israel's self-defense undermined any Arab respect and will for peace, thus forming the root of terror.

    By failing to provide any "appropriate procedures or methods of regulation" as demanded in Charter Article 36, the UN Security Council has forced Israel into permanent self-defense. Thus, the resolutions which repeatedly called Israel to withdraw from occupied security strips like that in southern Lebanon, hindered it to appropriately shelter their citizens from being attacked interminably from these areas. 

    This way, an unreasonable priority was given to the inviolability of the territory of states according to Article 2 over the right of self-defense according to Article 51. - Of course, the inviolability of humans in defense represents a higher legal interest as the inviolability of the territory of aggressors.

    One of the collateral damages of the UN’s support of terrorists was the civil war in Lebanon, as the growing number of radical Islamists in the UNRWA refugee camps undermined the traditional balance of power and relative harmony between the Christian majority and the Muslims. This war (1975-1990) had three serious effects. Firstly, persecution and refugee movements transformed the previously majorly Christian country into a Muslim one. Secondly, the EU countries took in Muslims as well as Christian refugees. 

    Over the years, the autocratic leaders in the Islamic world must have realized that there is no more effective strategy for spreading Islam than to unleash crises, wars and civil wars in Muslim countries that trigger migration flows.

    Since October 07, 2023, the concerted propaganda tsunami launched by the UN, “benevolent” NGOs and Mainstream media is giving the terrorists the image of legitimate liberators, while their truly genocidal “program” is kept widely hidden.  Instead, Israel's necessary defense efforts are slanderously mislabeled as genocide. 

    This upside-down propaganda atmosphere - intentionally or not - provides a "moral" pretext for an actual genocide of Jews in the future.

    In conclusion, the root of terrorism lies in the "moral" support for Arab revanchism in the fight for Israel's territory and against its existence. The Arab strategy is to buy time by shirking negotiations. This gain in time serves, firstly, a demographic overtaking process and, secondly, the propagandistic development of a pseudo-moral ideology that justifies the expulsion of the Jews from Israel.

    The extreme extent of bias and violating of own Charter principles by the UN shows the urgent necessity of profound reforms.