Back in mid-2021, I predicted the Ukraine war and the current fifth Middle East war with all the resulting problems, such as the propaganda tsunami against Israel and the growing anti-Semitism even in the USA. For the realistic prediction, no more was needed than knowing the roots - which can be found in the midst of the supposedly solidarity alliance of free Western nations.
Israel has sufficiently demonstrated its military superiority in 1948, 1956, 1967 and 1973. Under normal circumstances, such a clear series of successes would have led to a respected, stable regional order. But such normal conditions that allow for stabilizing respect have long since ceased to exist. On the contrary, the Arab terrorism that continues unabated to this day represents an escalating form of disrespect that threatens the very existence of the Jewish state.
It was not foreign military interference that prevented Israel from establishing a stable order, but the interference of supposedly good people and organizations. The UN's founding summit in the summer of 1945 had propagated a truly grand project - the establishment of a non-violent new world order. But looking back, the official proclamation can be identified as a gigantic misnomer. First, the UN Charter represents nothing more than a declaration of intent and something like a basic constitution which largely lacks clear, applicable rules. Despite its involvement in thousands of international conflicts over the past 79 years, the world organization has failed to develop the full legal toolkit that is indispensable for a fair and consistent settlement of international disputes. Worse still, the UN, founded as a supposed alliance of shared values and principles, soon turned out to be an unsolidary collection of unjustly bullying, tribalistic states that were ready to accept and enforce the right of the strongest.1)
Despite or, more precisely, because of the UN's actions, the almost 80 years since 1945 have been marked by endless tensions, wars and civil wars. Over time, the security situation has worsened, as can be seen in the sharp increase in migration movements triggert by violence. Contrary to the promises of the UN Charter, there has been no expansion of free democracy, but rather of autocracy. Until 1991, the blame for this global disaster could be attributed to Soviet influence and activities. This has now proven to have been a cheap excuse - as since the collapse of the Soviet Union, the decline of Western influence and democracy has even accelerated. The number of autocracies has recently overtaken that of democracies.
Since external powers including China still lack the ability to seriously challenge the UK and US-led West (including in the field of cyber espionage), the causes of the current security crisis must lie almost entirely within the West itself. – This assessment is confirmed by a doubly self-destructive Western policy: Towards the expanding political Islam an appeasement course is being pursued, which opens the door to streams of migrants without prospect of real integration. These streams have been kept going by internal unrest in the countries of origin since the Lebanese Civil War and increased by Western military interference which proves to be generally counterproductive.
Towards Russia in contrast and after having signed the friendly 1997 NATO-Russia Founding Act, a course of cold exclusion, hard sanctions and unfair reporting is being pursued. After two senseless fratricidal wars, it’s time to remember the ability and readyness of people of all European countries to integrate and live peacefully with one another - as was proven when they formed new nations especially in the Americas.
Suicide can happen either under enormous psychological pressure or under complete disorientation.In particular, the decisions of European politicians reflect a frightening combination of both. Psychologically, they collectively bow to authoritarian NATO and MIC militarists. Under this barely democratic influence, Western political representatives are currently leading their nations on a suicidal course of potential mutual annihilation against Russia.2) Additionally and like common citizens, these politicians largely lack basic orientation about the historical background of conflicts and thus about the actual legal status of the conflicting parties in question. (The latter fact is exacerbated by the aforementioned lack of applicable international rules based on the principles of the UN Charter.)
According to the rule of law in an alliance of free democratic nations, such self-destruction should have been prevented from the outset. Normally, it was the task of the free press to warn about such objectively dangerous developments in good time - long before escalating decisions lead to a loss of control. But as already mentioned in the second paragraph, such normal conditions have long since ceased to exist. Free civilization is under attack in a war by other means.3)
In this historic moment of awakening, the supposedly free media must first become aware of the influence of non-solidarity forces which inconspicously tries to use them as an apparatus of opinion manipulation contrary to liberty. In order to be able to realistically analyze and solve the current security crisis, the following must be taken into account:
1. During the course of the 19th century, many countries, especially in Europe, had adopted free democracy by following the successful example of the USA. But shortly before 1900, during the presidency of William McKinley, a profound paradigm shift for the worse took place. Tragically, this was able to happen against the explicit warnings of the US Founding Fathers.4)
2. After World War II, the counterproductiveness of US military actions reached new dimensions. From Korea and Vietnam to Afghanistan, the once peaceful spread of free democracy was replaced by policies that ruined its reputation instead. (One common practice was replacing elected governments with autocrats, as in Iran in 1953 and Guatemala in the same decade. Another was establishing corrupt “democratic” governments, as in Iraq and Afghanistan. The inevitable “success” (guess for whom) was a “sustainable” destruction of the West’s reputation in the world.5)
3. From 2003 to 2011, almost the entire West, as well as some autocratic states in the Gulf region, supported the US military in the disastrously counterproductive Iraq War. There, irrational militarism experienced complete moral and ideological bankruptcy: the so-called Coalition of the Willing, led by Britain and the USA, consisting of more than 40 countries, spent around a trillion dollars, left behind around 500,000 civilian deaths and took almost 9 years - not to bring freedom and prosperity, but to destroy the economy of a single medium-sized Arab country and ruin the global reputation of the entire West. This monstrosity can only be understood, if at all, through a drastic comparison: in 1967, tiny Israel defeated three, indirectly even four Arab countries within 6 days.
4. With a properly functioning free press as a guardian of democracy and the interests of the free nation, such an absurdity would have been recognized and criticized for what it is. But in fact, the supposedly free press has never helped to stop the counterproductive military operations through rational arguments and moral considerations. Instead, it has helped to cover up irrational actions by showing inappropriate understanding.
5. In a gigantic concerted action with thousands of supposedly charitable organizations, large parts of this free press have outed themselves as extremely history-distorting, unfair and far removed from Western values when they launched their propaganda tsunami against Israel almost immediately after October 7, swapping victims and perpetrators.
6. After the Hamas rocket attacks and corresponding Israeli retaliation in May 2021, the current new Middle East war was predictable, as was the propaganda war that Israel and the Jews have faced since then.6)
7. To stage this war by other means against Israel and to expand it to the current dimensions since October 7th requires enormous financial and publicist power. - This fact drastically limits the circle of those allegedly responsible. For Jews it is necessary to overcome a psychological taboo to finally identify some false friends as the main problem behind the current security crisis - see point 11 and reference7)
8. Since all current parts of the general security crisis (including a looming civil war in the USA) have the same roots, there is also a common solution - the reintegration of a completely detached money aristocracy into their free, democratic nations.
9. The counterproductivity of the British and US military interventions stands in sharp contrast to the brilliant success of the Israeli armed forces. It’s dangerous for Israel, that the striking comparative example poses a threat to the credibility of the huge collection of fairy tales about British-American military actions that supposedly took place in the interests of "national security". - A repeat of the military successes of the Jewish state is not desirable from the point of view of the undemocratic forces.
10. Consequently, Israeli politics is being manipulated to follow the irrational path of the US-led Western states. On this suicidal path, the United States has already exhausted its strength in mostly unnecessary and counterproductive military interventions. At the same time, it has dangerously neglected the ideological defense of free democracy and the solidarity between their own nation’s citizens.
11. Israel's current threat is defined less by its open enemies than by the fact that all of them are little more than puppets on a planet that is gradually transformed into a puppet theater. Orienting oneself in the jungle of distracting nonsense, insincere half-information and some selective disinformation requires thinking outside the box. That is, one must expect that supposed friends are actual enemies. False friends are particularly dangerous because they use others as their tools and incite them against each other.
12. Iran in particular, which was "sustainably" prevented from developing into a free democracy through the overthrow of the elected Prime Minister Dr. Mossadegh by the CIA/ MI6 in 1953, has been systematically portrayed as the most evil of all Islamist regimes since 1979.
13. But a major inconsistency on this point should arouse suspicion. This concerns, among other things, the fact that not Iran but Saudi Arabia has been the historically most significant supporter of terrorists.9) And while the media also emphasize Iran's ties to Hamas, it was Qatar that, with billions in transfers to Gaza, at least indirectly financed the rockets fired at Israel. While Qatar cultivates a pro-Western image, it hosts Hamas leaders and funds anti-Semitism in American universities.
14. The decision to kill Hamas leader Haniyeh during his visit to Iran was undoubtedly designed to teach the mullahs respect. But choosing Tehran over his long-time luxury residence in Qarar has helped to focus attention on Iran and this way set another step toward the worst-case scenario of mutual annihilation between Iran and Israel.
References
1) https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/unrwas-success-record/
2) https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/at-the-crossroads-an-understanding-solution-or-world-war/
3) https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/the-multi-front-war-against-israel-and-free-civilization/
4) https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/2024-decisive-year-for-freedom/
6) https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/com/indispensable-solidarity-with-israel-actualized-version/
7) https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/why-palestinian-extremists-can-refuse-any-serious-negotiations/
8) https://risingtidefoundation.net/2024/01/06/sun-yat-sens-advice-to-young-revolutionaries/ (view the 3 quotes on Britain/ England)
9) https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-real-largest-state-sponsor-of-terrorism